Hadith 19
۞
Reply to the third objection: “The benefit of Imamate according to you is that it takes people away from evil acts. However, this cannot be achieved with the Imam in hiding and therefore, his existence and non-existence are not much different. As his hidden existence does not correspond to his necessary existence you have argued for, your argument – despite being contradicted when he is found administering the society, and administering the society is not necessary during occultation – doesn’t lead to the existence of an Imam, who is not running the affairs of society and neither in occultation the control of Imam on the society is proved.
وأما الكلام في الفصل الثالث: من قوله:إن الفائدة بالامامة هي كونه مبعدا من القبيح على قولكم، وذلك لم يحصل مع غيبته، فلم ينفصل وجوده من عدمه، فإذا لم يختص وجوده غائبا بوجه الوجوب الذي ذكروه لم يقتض دليلكم وجوب وجوده مع الغيبـة، دليلكم مع أنه منتقض حيث وجد مع انبساط اليد، ولم يجب انبساط اليد مع الغيبة، فهو غير متعلق بوجود إمام غير منبسط اليد ولا هو حاصل في هذه الحال.
Tags
Occultation
Similar narrations
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #20 We reply that the opponent has only complicated his argument, as logicians say, by turning around premises and referring them to one...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #10 Second objection: Occultation violates the reasoning of necessity of Imamate in every age, because, if the fact that the presence of a...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #11 Third objection: It is to say that according to you, the benefit of Imamate is that it leads people away from wrong. However, this cannot be...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #214 Sayyid Murtadha says: The question of the opponent from us that why the Imam does not appear to his devotees is irrelevant, because if he...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #17 We said this is disguising lunacy in lucidity, because he presupposes that we say that proof for existence of the Imam stands during...