Hadith 11
۞
Third objection: It is to say that according to you, the benefit of Imamate is that it leads people away from wrong. However, this cannot be achieved with him being in hiding and therefore, his existence and non-existence have no difference. As his hidden existence does not correspond to his necessary existence you have argued for, your argument does not lead to the necessity of his existence during occultation. Therefore, though your argument indicates your point when he exists in the condition of administering the society, it does not prove an Imam, who is not running the affairs of the society, and in occultation the control of Imam on the society is also not proved.
والثالث: أن يقال: إن الفائدة بالامامة هي كونه مبعدا من القبيح على قولكم، وذلك لا يحصل مع وجوده غائبا فلم ينفصل وجوده من عدمه، وإذا لم يختص وجوده غائبا بوجه الوجوب الذي ذكروه لم يقتض دليلكم وجوب وجوده مع الغيبة، فدليلكم مع أنه منتقض حيث وجد مع انبساط اليد، ولم يجب انبساط اليد مع الغيبة، فهو غير متعلق بوجود إمام غير منبسط اليد ولا هو حاصل في هذه الحال.
Tags
Occultation
Similar narrations
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #17 We said this is disguising lunacy in lucidity, because he presupposes that we say that proof for existence of the Imam stands during...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #20 We reply that the opponent has only complicated his argument, as logicians say, by turning around premises and referring them to one...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #10 Second objection: Occultation violates the reasoning of necessity of Imamate in every age, because, if the fact that the presence of a...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #19 Reply to the third objection: “The benefit of Imamate according to you is that it takes people away from evil acts. However, this cannot be...
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #27 If it is said: Given the existence of a leader, who is obeyed and runs the affairs of the society is necessary, either it is all the work of...