Hadith 640
۞
H 381 - A group of scholars narrated to us from Abu Muhammad Harun Ibn Musa from Abu Ali Muhammad Ibn Himam that Muhammad Ibn Ali Shalmaghani was never a representative of Abul Qasim, nor was a link to him. Abul Qasim had not appointed him to any position for any reason. Whoever says that he was a Shia scholar and then went stray and expressed these blasphemies, disbelief and heresy, is wrong. The holy letter came through Abul Qasim, condemning him to damnation and denouncing him, his followers, companions and believers.
381- وأخبرنا جماعة عن أبي محمد هارون بن موسى عن أبي علي محمد بن همام أن محمد بن علي الشلمغاني لم يكن قط بابا إلى أبي القاسم ولا طريقا له ولا نصبه أبو القاسم لشيء من ذلك على وجه ولا سبب،ومن قال
بذلك فقد أبطل. وإنما كان فقيها من فقهائنا وخلط وظهر عنه ما ظهر وانتشر الكفر والإلحاد عنه.فخرج فيه التوقيع على يد أبي القاسم بلعنه والبراءة منه ممن تابعه وشايعه وقال بقوله.
Similar narrations
- Muʿjam al-Aḥādīth al-Muʿtabara #365 al-Shari’i had the Kuniyya Abi Muhammad [Harun said: I think his name was al-Hasan] and he was one of the companions of Abi al-Hasan Ali b....
- Kitāb al-Ghayba #623 I think his name was Hasan and he was from the companions of Abul Hasan Ali Ibn Muhammad and then after him from the companions of Hasan Ibn...